HOME
LAKES
REPORTS
FORUMS
TRAVEL
DEALS
SEARCH
MORE
Currently 63° PARTLY CLOUDY
Winds11mph
Humidity82%
Visibility10mi
Dew Point57°
Wisconsin Drives Chevy
Chevy: WI Fish Reports Mobile Header
cfwaterHeader2ecfm443092612$funcCOUNTYNAME@6472eacd County
FISHING REPORTS

Lake Michigan

Racine County, Wisconsin
Wisconsin drives
Chevrolet Logo
Chevy Fishing Report Featured Vehicle: THE 2024 TRAIL BLAZER
THE 2024 TRAIL BLAZER
moon phase
Sun times displayed in .

Displaying 20 to 29 of 1,097 posts
FEATURED POST
Buy a PREMIUM Onchor trolling rod and get a FREE Okuma linecounter!
Here’s a special deal on Onchor salmon & steelhead trolling combos from the St. Croix Factory Store! Choose and purchase any one of five PREMIUM Onchor trolling rod models and get an Okuma Coldwater 303D line-counter trolling reel for FREE – a $110 value!
6/8/23 @ 7:40 AM
Carpio
Carpio
PRO MEMBER User since 11/5/17
Otto.  I know about the state record but he’s referring to Brookies being caught off shore in Lake Michigan.
6/8/23 @ 12:48 AM
fishforthehalibut
User since 6/6/14
LMFAO! If we took your brain out and put it on the edge of a razor blade, it would look like a pee rolling down a freeway ??. I’ll man up, but will your husband let you? I talk to the DNR  a lot and I have heard there excuses. I unlike you and some of these other chose to believe everything that comes out of the mouth. I choose not to because the proof is in the pudding. Throughout the 80’s and up to about 2015 you could go to the Kenosha harbor all summer and catch browns coho and the occasional king. The same is true for Racine, Milwaukee, Port Washington and Sheboygan. They chose to stock more Chinook for the charter boats,which is fine because the deserve to make a living, and not browns because it was “costing too much to supply the browns. The only problem with that argument is that they choose to do this when the bait fish population was almost nothing. You should do a little research your self Einstein, it takes 2 1/2 browns to eat as many alewives as 1 chinook does. That’s fact, so if they were so worried about the declining bait fish population, why would you choose to stock the top predator. I have wasted enough time on this ??.

Good luck everyone else
Hopefully something will change.
6/7/23 @ 9:58 PM
cycleguy
User since 2/8/05
Lol…. And the genius has spoken….  Because you can’t catch fish and don’t own a boat everyone else is wrong.  Simply google why the dnr doesn’t stock that strain and you will see the science behind it…. Idiot.

Man up…. And ?quit crying about your own limitations.

One of the many results:
https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/MIDNR/bulletins/949bae
6/7/23 @ 9:30 PM
fishforthehalibut
User since 6/6/14
Cycleguy you can’t be that damn dumb! But apparently you are. The DNR stopped stocking the wild rose strain of Browns to make you whiners happy by stocking more kings. That is one way that they have affected shore fishing. I could give you more, but you obviously don’t know how things work. Those browns stayed near shore almost all summer!
6/7/23 @ 8:59 AM
otto1981
PRO MEMBER User since 3/16/22
state record Lake Michigan Brook Trout from Wis. shores is 10.1#

6/7/23 @ 8:52 AM
Carpio
Carpio
PRO MEMBER User since 11/5/17
8 - 12# Brookies ?     Off shore in Wisconsin, where,when?  
6/7/23 @ 8:31 AM
pier-pressure
User since 6/1/08
I wish they would stock tiger trout again. They got really big and never left the harbor areas. With all the goby now they would be an incredible addition for shore guys. Tigers are stocked in western states to control suckers so I am positive they would feast on goby. Plus they are warm water tolerant like browns.
6/7/23 @ 8:19 AM
migr8r
migr8r
User since 2/8/11
Shore fishing isn’t what it used to be because of the change in the lake over the last 30 years. Zebra and quagga mussels have the most to do with it. Used to be that the lake was much more fertile and always had color to it. Clearer water keeps the bait fish further offshore along with the trout and salmon. Stocking declines also have had an impact but there was a period where there were too many top predators and a shortage of bait fish. Stocking has increased along with added brook trout, so shore fishing should improve some. Another thing would be to release the browns. You can eat them once or let them go and catch them again. They taste terrible and spend a lot of time in the harbors collecting contaminates but if they were released, they could potentially live for years and get bigger and remain plentiful. I know the brook trout will be caught and kept but those too would get huge if released. In the early to mid 90’s there was a few years where catching 8-12 pound brook trout from shore wasn’t uncommon. 
6/7/23 @ 8:03 AM
kabeer
User since 12/8/05
Those are probably legit concerns. The summer-run Skamanias could be ALOT of fun on the right day when they were in. And I can remember going down to the piers mid-summer and seeing the old timers with a few domestic browns on the stringer even when the water was piss-warm. 
6/7/23 @ 7:36 AM
wskiph
wskiph
User since 9/3/11
About the shore fishing.   The dnr did contribute to the de line  by changing strains  of rainbow and brown trout.  They used to a rainbow bow that stayed in shallower water now  a different one that prefers the open water more 
?The browns planted were also a strain preferring shallower near shore like our harbors.   Now the SeirFollen is all they plant. They again wide ranging deep water ?
Also during Walkers regime stocki g cut 40
%    
Displaying 20 to 29 of 1,097 posts
Copyright © 2001-2024 Lake-Link Inc. All rights reserved.
No portion of this website can be used or distributed without prior written consent of Lake-Link, Inc.
This website may contain affiliate links, meaning when you click the links and make a purchase, we may receive a small commission.
Lake-Link Home
solid hook sets by
MENU
MORE TO EXPLORE